Geronimo
Translated by Gabriel Kuhn
PM Press, paperback
This English language translation of a book long-considered a classic
of autonomism provides a good introductory history of the German scene from the
tumultuous year of 1968 to the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989. But despite its
strictly chronological style, it manages to feel weirdly disjointed and
dispassionate, and so fails to provide much of a guide for those of us seeking
to organise non-hierarchically in the twenty-first century.
As ever for books on the left, there is a blizzard of acronyms, and if
you are a non-German reader then almost all will be entirely new. A glossary is
provided however, and if you keep referring back to it, this isn't too much of
a barrier.
Another common left problem encountered here is the slipperiness of
label definitions. This even applies to the term 'autonomism' itself, with
wildly different ideologies and forms of activity all coming under the same
umbrella term. For some this is a strength of 'autonomism', for others a
weakness, but when trying to read a book on the subject, it sometimes feels
like particular activities have been shoehorned into the 'autonomist'
definition simply because they are in some way anti-mainstream politics, and
not 'K-groups' (of which more later).
Geronimo adopts the eight part definition adopted in Italy during
1981: "we fight for ourselves", "we do not engage in dialogue
with those in power", "we have not found each other at the
workplace", "we all embrace a vague anarchism", "no power
to no one", difference from the "alternative movement", "we
are uncertain whether we want a revolt or a revolution", "we have no
organisation per se".
So vagueness and lifestylist individualism appears to be all, and yet
the 'autonomists' as identified by Geronimo did organise huge events, and they
did experiment with workplace organising. Focuses changed as history marched on
and changes in economics drove changes in society. This mechanism lies almost
entirely unexamined, accounting for much of the 'this happened, then this
happened' style.
This difficulty is evident from the very beginning when Geronimo deals
the year when workers and students rose in Paris, there was upheaval in
Czechoslovakia, the Black Panthers battled cops in America, and 'The Troubles'
began in the north of Ireland. All this took place as the post-war settlements
around the world were breaking down at their first major recessionary test.
Instead of looking at this, Geronimo tries to explain nearly everything in
terms of US imperialism's carnage in Vietnam. Beyond the immediate trigger for
action, the deeper motivations are not considered, and so any thorough analysis
of autonomism - or any movement - is impossible. Still, Geronimo notes that a
sizeable layer of students broke from the liberalism of the social democratic
centre-left.
The next section - and in my opinion by far the most impressive part
of the whole book - is actually dedicated to a very decent study of Italian
autonomism. It looks at the organic composition of Italian industry, before
tracing the shift from Stalinism to operaismo
('workerism') which - in contrast to a left which now sought to
integrate "the working class into capitalist development" - again
sought "the complete negation of the existing system". As employers
fought back by shipping out of operaist strongholds, the focus shifted to the
"social field" - i.e. riots, "proletarian shopping"
(organised mass looting), and the creation of a 'scene'.
And - aside from a few abortive attempts to organise factory workers -
the "social field" is the only one on which Geronimo describes the
various and diverse German autonome as playing on, following their formation in
reaction to their own Stalinist 'Communist parties' (those K-groups again).
We are therefore given brief sketches of the rise and fall of the
'spontis' (anti-organisational individuals emphasising the 'spontaneous'), the
insurrectionist Rote Armee Fraktion (Red Army Faction) and Revolutionäre Zellen
(Revolutionary Cells) in the 1970s. And then through to anti-Reagan,
anti-nuclear and mass squatting actions in the decade which was to catch the
autonomen by surprise at its dramatic conclusion - the fall of the Berlin Wall.
When I put down the book for the final time, I was left with a sense
that the sometimes massive numbers the autonomen pulled to their events, and
the often ferocious intensity of their battles with state forces, very little
had been achieved in the way of concrete gains. And this is the case whether
you prefer - as I do - to talk in terms of gains or losses for contending
social classes, or about individuals extending the reach of their own freedom
(as do the autonomists in the 1981 Italian theses).
One prominent exception is the mass squatting of Hamburg's
Hafenstrasse, which eventually led to the regional senate granting the
squatters the right to stay in the buildings they had brought into use. These
then became a prominent base for both a thriving counter-culture - including
support of the world-famous FC St. Pauli with its unique supporter comradeship
- and the autonomen's political struggles.
But apart from that - and the odd delay to this or that project of the
capitalist class - it's difficult to point to much in the way of success. Of
course, participants may well argue that I am being far too materialist, and
the success was the emotional 'freedom' gained from taking part. Of course,
that would be entirely their call. But perhaps that's almost the exact problem
with the type of autonomism espoused within these one hundred and eighty five
pages - it can be reduced to 'Did the individual have a good time while the
world continued to burn?'
So if Geronimo wanted to show the German brand of autonomism as being
a way forward for oppressed groups in the wider world - and I think he did -
then Fire and Flames utterly fails to convincingly make that case.
That's certainly not to say it's without merit - and as a bit of a politics
geek I loved the many demonstration photos and posters included - but perhaps
there is an even better book on the history of German autonomen just waiting to
be written.

No comments:
Post a Comment